Jump to Navigation

Irvine CA Business & Commercial Law Blog

Company looks to get in front of line for legal marijuana industry

Venture capital, as our readers know, is part of what makes the American economy go round, giving startups that don’t have access to capital markets. The payoff for investors, of course, can make it worth the risk. The risk must be well-calculated though. Ghost Group, a Newport Beach, California venture capital firm, has reportedly raised a $1 million fund for companies and technology in the legal cannabis and medical marijuana sector.

The status of marijuana is in somewhat of a national shift, with two states having legalized its recreational use, more states looking into the possibility of medical marijuana, and decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana is becoming more common. Ghost Group is apparently looking to take advantage of the “unrealized potential of this burgeoning sector.” 

Keurig, maker of single-cup brews, loses patent lawsuit

Litigation between businesses can take many forms and involve a variety of issues. One of these issues is patent infringement, which occurs when a party manufactures, sells, or uses patented technology without proper permission or license from the party that took out the patent, during the term of the patent. As general readers know, patents exclude competitors from making, using, selling, or exporting patent-protected products or components.

A recent example of patent infringement involves Keurig Inc.k, the maker of single-cup coffee brewing systems. Keurig lost a patent challenge to a California competitor by the name of JBR Inc. In its patent suit, Keurig alleged that JBR’s One Cup product constituted an infringement of three of its patents for single-server beverage-brewer containers. 

NASDAQ to pay millions to settled botched handling of IPO

Our readers may remember that it has been almost a year since Facebook went on the public stock market. Much has been written about whether this was a smart decision for the company to make. At the time, Facebook executives said that they were forced to go public by Securities and Exchange Commission rules governing the company’s shareholder count. Essentially, they said, because so many of Facebook’s employees were shareholders, the company had to be offered on the public market.

Whether or not that is true—this has been debated—the company’s conversion didn’t go completely smoothly. In fact, Nasdaq OMX Group Inc., the company that owns and operates the NASDAQ stock market, recently agreed to pay $10 million to settle Securities and Exchange Commission charges that the company mishandled Facebook’s initial public offering last year and thereby violated securities laws. 

Yahoo agreement to purchase Tumblr raises questions

Another tech-savvy entrepreneur has joined the ranks of those who developed an online service only to turn around and become a millionaire after selling it. We’re speaking of David Karp, the creator of the popular blogging service Tumblr. For those who aren’t familiar with the service, Tumblr is a blogging platform that allows users to post text, images, videos, links, quotes and audio to their tumbleblog.

The deal with Yahoo, the company that purchased Tumblr, is the largest acquisition of a social networking company in years, passing up even Facebook’s purchase of Instagram last year.  Why did Yahoo purchase the blogging platform? According to CEO Marissa Mayer, to give the company a new appeal to young people and missing out on years of revolutions in social networking and mobile devices. 

Sir, no sir! 'GI Joe' screenwriters sue over sequel

The screenwriters of "G.I. Joe: The Rise of the Cobra" recently filed a lawsuit in a California federal court over key story elements of the sequel to their movie. The two accuse the two studios and the production and distribution company involved with the film as well as toymaker Hasbro Inc. of breach of implied contract and copyright infringement and ask that revenue from the sequel be placed in a constructive trust. They also ask for $23 million in damages.

The first movie was released in 2009, and the defendants began to plan a follow-up. While no one inked a contract with the writing team for the sequel, the defendants did, according to the complaint, ask them to come up with ideas for the next movie in the franchise.

Crowdfunding could be the demise of venture capital, p. 2

We are discussing crowdfunding and entrepreneurs' increasing reliance on the Internet-based strategy to fund their businesses. One crowdfunding company boasts that businesses have raised $200 million through its website over the past seven or eight years. While the pros are many, there is one major concern: To misquote Edward G. Robinson in "Little Caesar," "Mother of mercy, is this the end of venture capital?" 

California's venture capital community wants to know. If this relatively new -- and soon to expand, thanks to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule changes -- platform going to replace the shrewd business people who have especially deep pockets with the armchair investor who has a little left over at the end of the month?

Crowdfunding could be the demise of venture capital

Few business communities know better than California's how technology has changed the way businesses are launched, managed and grown. If you remember the 1980s, you remember that the venture capitalist was king. This was the person who could identify talent and drive and make a business happen. A good idea is nothing but a good idea without financial backing, right?

In the decades that followed, venture capital would evolve as markets changed and the Internet took hold. The bursting of the tech bubble and the financial meltdown of 2008 would winnow the field of funders to a precious few. So, if Warren Buffet is busy, who ya gonna call?

The answer is, "Everyone." You are going to call everyone. The Internet has introduced The Crowd to the funding mix, and The Crowd (our term, capital letters intended) could spell extinction for venture capital firms that are not on a par with Warren Buffet.

Report: Content, connectivity drive M&A activity in EMC this year

PricewaterhouseCoopers has released its annual report on merger, acquisition and other deal activity in the entertainment, media and communications industries -- industries that have been a mainstay of the economy here in southern California. As usual, the report includes an analysis of the prior year's deals, and what a year it was.

Companies in the EMC category reported $96.2 billion in merger, acquisition and other business combinations in 2012, a whopping 43 percent increase over 2011's $55 billion. All of those assets changed hands in fewer deals, too -- 839 in 2012 versus 931 in 2011. The Softbank Corp. acquisition of Sprint Nextel Corp. was the largest deal by far at $20.1 billion, more than three times as large as the next biggest deal of the year.

Publishing houses receive EU's blessings to merge

Two book publishers that have been household names for decades have cleared a major hurdle on their way to the altar. The companies, Random House and Penguin, are not based in California, but the merger offers a good example of the types of issues that regulators look at when competitors look to combine forces.

Pearson is an international company that owns a number of famous imprints, including Penguin, Dorling Kindersley and Rough Guides. Bertelsmann describes itself as a global media conglomerate whose publishing arm is Random House. Regulators are naturally concerned that a combination of two large companies could impede competition in the marketplace, in this case the English-language publishing marketplace.

Federal judge accuses Apple, Google of using litigation as a business strategy

For several years now, tech giants Apple and Google-owned Motorola have been locked in a rather bitter patent infringement battle spanning multiple forums and hundreds of legal claims.

To illustrate, Motorola filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in January 2012 accusing Cupertino-based Apple of infringing upon 12 patents to which Apple responded by accusing Mountain View-based Google of infringing upon 10 patents.

Since that time, the lawsuit has ballooned to 180 claims relating to the 12 patents and legal disputes over the definitions of more than 100 patent terms stemming directly from these claims.

While the two sides acknowledged that the case needs to be streamlined through the voluntary dropping of both patents and claims, they were unable to reach a resolution and ultimately petitioned the judge to hold a case management conference. Here, the purpose of such a conference would be to narrow the scope of the case with the assistance of the federal court.

Subscribe to This Blog's Feed

Firm Information

Indeglia & Carney
1900 Main Street, Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92614

Phone: 949-861-3321
Toll free: 800-643-6423
Fax: 949-861-3324
Irvine Law Office Map

FindLaw Network